Friday, September 5, 2025

Trump wants '2 people to drop out' to set up '1-on-1' mayoral race with Mamdani in NYC

President Donald Trump, aiming to defeat Democratic Party nominee Zohran Mamdani in New York City's high-profile mayoral election, is urging rival candidates to drop out.

"I don't think you can win unless you have one on one," Trump told reporters before a White House dinner with leading tech industry executives on Thursday night.

Mamdani, the 33-year-old Ugandan-born socialist state lawmaker from the New York City borough of Queens, who has gained notoriety for his history of communist and antisemitic rhetoric, shocked the political world in June as he defeated former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and nine other candidates by double-digits to capture the Democratic Party's mayoral nomination.

Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 amid multiple scandals, is running in the general election as an independent candidate. So is Mayor Eric Adams, the embattled incumbent who announced earlier this year that he would bypass the Democratic primary amid plummeting approval ratings.

MAMDANI AND CUOMO DEBATE OVER DEBATES IN NYC MAYORAL SHOWDOWN

Also on the ballot is Guardian Angels co-founder Curtis Sliwa, who for a second straight election is the Republican mayoral nominee.

But Mamdani is the clear polling frontrunner in a city where Democrats dominate the political landscape. And a victory in November would make him the first Muslim and first millennial mayor of the nation's most populous city.

Mamdani surged to a primary victory thanks to an energetic campaign that put a major focus on affordability and New York City's high cost of living. It was fueled by a grassroots army of supporters and backing from top national progressive champions, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

ADAMS, CUOMO TRADE JABS IN INTERVIEWS AS DEMS-TURNED-INDEPENDENTS COURT ANTI-MAMDANI VOTE

And Mamdani made smart use of social media platforms, including TikTok, as he engaged low-propensity voters. His far-left proposals include eliminating fares to ride New York City's vast bus system, making CUNY (City University of New York) "tuition-free," freezing rents on municipal housing, offering "free childcare" for children up to age 5 and setting up government-run grocery stores.

Trump, a native New Yorker who nowadays calls Florida home, once again weighed in on the race, saying, "I would like to see two people drop out and have it be one on one. And I think that's a race that could be won."

The president also reiterated his claim that Mamdani is a communist.

"I'd prefer not to have a communist mayor of New York City. And, you know, that's what he is based on his policy. If you look at his statements in the past," Trump said.

WHITE HOUSE SILENT ON REPORT THAT TRUMP ALLIES HAVE WEIGHED LURING ADAMS TO ADMINISTRATION TO UNDERCUT MAMDANI

Trump did not say which candidates he would like to see drop out. And asked by reporters if he's encouraged any of the mayoral contenders to exit the race, Trump said, "No."

Top Trump advisors are trying to persuade Adams and Sliwa to drop out of the race by offering them positions in the president's administration, the New York Times reported this week.

And the New York Post reported that Trump wants the candidates to bow out by next week.

The New York Times and New York Post have also reported that Adams has told a small group of friends and advisers that he is considering job opportunities that would prompt him to suspend his mayoral re-election campaign. 

And both newspapers also reported that while in Florida on Tuesday, Adams met with top Trump envoy and advisor Steve Witkoff.

But the mayor and his campaign publicly reiterate that he's not exiting the race.

"Not dropping out," Adams campaign spokesperson Todd Shapiro told Fox News' Henry Naccari.

On Friday, Adams doubled down, saying in a statement, "I am still running for re-election."

But in what appeared to be an acknowledgment of the reported job offer in the Trump administration, the mayor wrote, "While I will always listen if called to serve our country, no formal offers have been made."

Sliwa emphasized in a Fox News Digital interview last month: "I'm not dropping out. I'm a major party candidate. Let the independents play musical chairs and decide who to drop out."

He has reiterated in recent days that he's not dropping out and has said that he has no interest in working in the Trump administration.

Cuomo, speaking with reporters on Thursday, said he had "no idea" whether the reports on Trump trying to clear the field for him were accurate, and he said he hadn't spoken to Trump or Adams.

"I know nothing about that speculation," the former governor said.

Trump's comments on the mayoral race came hours after Cuomo challenged Mamdani to five different debates across all five New York City buroughs.

Cuomo argued that Mamdani had failed "to give a straight answer" to reporters' questions and had changed his mind "on everything" he has said on the campaign trail.

"When you try to ask [Mamdani] a question, he will simply not answer, and he obfuscates. And, frankly, you guys let him get away with it," Cuomo said. "I won't let him get away with it. And New Yorkers won't let him get away with it."

But Mamdani shot back with a proposal of his own: debate Trump.

"Let’s cut out the middle man. Why should I debate Donald Trump’s puppet when I could debate Donald Trump himself?" Mamdani's campaign told Fox News Digital in a statement. "If Donald Trump is serious about intervening in the mayoral race, he should come to New York City and debate me directly about why he’s cutting SNAP benefits for hungry New Yorkers to give tax breaks to his wealthy donors."

Meanwhile, in a sign of its fundraising prowess and grassroots strength, the Mamdani campaign on Friday announced that it had officially reached New York City’s $8 million spending cap, and said it would urge supporters to stop donating.

Fox News' Courtney De George contributed to this report.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/bcrLadP

Notorious people search site returns after massive breach

Over a year ago, National Public Data (NPD) made headlines for one of the largest breaches in history. The people-search site exposed the personal information of 3 billion individuals. After disappearing from the internet, the site has returned under new ownership, sparking fresh concerns about privacy.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CyberGuy.com newsletter.

NPD has relaunched under Perfect Privacy LLC, a company that sounds protective but is not affiliated with the VPN service of the same name. Despite the new name behind the scenes, the business model has not changed. The site still allows anyone to look up personal data about friends, relatives or strangers with just a name.

MAJOR DATA BROKER HACK IMPACTS 364,000 INDIVIDUALS’ DATA

Although NPD includes disclaimers about the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), nothing prevents users from misusing this data when making decisions about employment, housing or credit.

According to NPD, the data comes from public records, property ownership databases, social media and government agencies. The company claims to verify and filter this information to ensure it is accurate and up-to-date. However, users may find that profiles still contain mistakes.

A quick test search revealed a mix of outdated and accurate information. The site struggled with hyphenated names but pulled up correct details in other cases.

We reached out to NPD for a comment, but did not hear back before our deadline.

If you prefer not to have your information available on NPD's site, you can request removal directly:

Keep in mind that each profile needs its own request and confirmation email. After you submit, check back in a few days to make sure your data is actually gone.

Pro tip: Use an alias or disposable email address for these requests. This makes it easier to track confirmations and keeps your main inbox clear.

For recommendations on private and secure email providers that offer alias addresses, visit CyberGuy.com.

Removing your information from National Public Data is only the beginning. Dozens of other people-search sites may still display your personal details. Many of these platforms pull from the same public databases, which means your address, phone number or relatives' names can keep reappearing.

The return of NPD shows how quickly data can resurface online. A breach may fade from the headlines, but the exposed information rarely disappears. To protect your privacy, you need a broader plan.

Start by searching for your name on people-search engines several times a year. Look beyond NPD. Sites like Whitepages, Spokeo and Radaris often host similar data. Regular checks help you spot new profiles before they spread further.

STOP DATA BROKERS FROM SELLING YOUR INFORMATION ONLINE

A removal service can save time by scanning hundreds of databases at once. These services request opt-outs on your behalf and track new listings. While no service can guarantee the complete removal of your data from the internet, a data removal service is really a smart choice.  They aren’t cheap, and neither is your privacy.  These services do all the work for you by actively monitoring and systematically erasing your personal information from hundreds of websites.  It’s what gives me peace of mind and has proven to be the most effective way to erase your personal data from the internet.  By limiting the information available, you reduce the risk of scammers cross-referencing data from breaches with information they might find on the dark web, making it harder for them to target you.

Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting CyberGuy.com.

Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: CyberGuy.com.

Protecting your privacy goes beyond deleting profiles. Keep an eye on your bank statements, credit reports and online accounts. Criminals can use exposed data for phishing attempts, fake loan applications or identity theft. Monitoring activity gives you an early warning if something looks suspicious.

The best way to safeguard yourself from malicious links that install malware, which could potentially access your private information, is to have strong antivirus software installed on all your devices. This protection can also alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, keeping your personal information and digital assets safe.

Get my picks for the best 2025 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at CyberGuy.com.

4) Set up alerts for your identity

Many banks and credit monitoring services let you create alerts for suspicious activity. You can also set up free fraud alerts with the credit bureaus. These warnings tell lenders to take extra steps to verify your identity before issuing new credit.

Identity theft companies can monitor personal information like your Social Security Number (SSN), phone number and email address, and alert you if it is being sold on the dark web or being used to open an account. They can also assist you in freezing your bank and credit card accounts to prevent further unauthorized use by criminals.

See my tips and best picks on how to protect yourself from identity theft at CyberGuy.com.

People-search sites often pull records from government databases. Review your local county's property, court or voter registration records. Some jurisdictions allow you to request redactions or limit what is shown online.

Since NPD and similar sites scrape from social media, tighten your privacy settings. Limit what strangers can see on Facebook, LinkedIn and other platforms. The less public information you share, the less these databases can collect.

The return of National Public Data is a reminder that your personal information can resurface at any time. Even if you remove yourself from one site, dozens more may still hold your details. That is why protecting your privacy requires more than a quick opt-out. With regular checks, credit freezes and stronger account monitoring, you can reduce your risk and stay one step ahead.

Do you think stronger laws should be in place to stop companies from collecting and selling personal data, or is it up to individuals to protect themselves? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CyberGuy.com newsletter.

Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/rkzdtNQ

DAVID MARCUS: RFK Jr is right, nobody knows how many Americans died of COVID

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. appeared before the Senate Finance Committee on Thursday in a hearing that made the Jerry Springer show look like an Oxford Union debate, but amid the pompous posturing from Democrats, an important truth came out.

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., thought he scored major points by asking RFK Jr the gotcha question — "how many Americans died of COVID?" When the secretary said that he did not know, a giddy Warner thought he could spike the football.

INTO THE ARENA: HOSTILE DEMOCRATS, SKEPTICAL REPUBLICANS TEAR INTO KENNEDY ON THE HILL

But here’s the thing: RFK Jr. is right. Nobody actually knows how many people have died of COVID, because we don’t really even know what dying of COVID means. 

Democrats and dim-witted fact-checkers will cry out that we have that data, that both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization say 1.2 million lives were lost to the Chinese virus.

However, we know that at the height of the pandemic some motorcycle accidents were listed as COVID deaths if the victim tested positive for it, and we know that thousands and thousands of Americans with myriad medical conditions died with, not of, COVID.

We also know that during the pandemic, both the CDC and the WHO were two of the worst and least reliable actors in the entire miserable fiasco. Everybody paying attention admits now that CDC guidance on masking and social distancing might as well have been magical incantations.

There was no data to back up these restrictions, and even when the CDC did collect data, they didn’t just do a bad job, they intentionally stacked the deck to make COVID look as deadly and terrifying as possible.

Meanwhile, the CDC and the medical establishment nationwide spent most of 2020, as COVID restrictions raged, not just refusing to listen to contrary voices like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and Dr. Scott Atlas, but trying to destroy their lives and careers.

This led to another very telling moment in the hearing, this time involving Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who made one of the most hilariously comic appeals to authority in recent memory. 

The socialist senator told Kennedy, "We’ve got the entire medical community on one side, The AMA [American Medical Association] representing hundreds of thousands of doctors, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Health Association." Then he asked Kennedy, what organizations does his side have?

I’m going to be less polite than the secretary was and say, none of them, thank goodness, because these are the same lunatics who lied their way through COVID and affirm 87 genders.

Kennedy’s more politic answer was that he is backed up by and working with the very scientists, like Bhattacharya, who were right about COVID in the first place, while Bernie’s alphabet soup of medical incompetence was masking babies.

Democrats and the medical establishment are now like middle-school bullies who don’t have a high school growth spurt and are suddenly as harmless as a flower. President Donald Trump knows this, and it is exactly why he tapped the Kennedy scion to fix public health.

In a less cynical time, the coin of the Kennedy realm was public service. John F. Kennedy campaigning in West Virginia in 1960, looking up at the voters on their porch, knowing they were the boss, not him, asking for their trust, not demanding it.

So too, RFK Jr. is hellbent on serving the people, not the establishment. That's why so many MAHA moms who know they have been lied to about what they feed their kids held their noses and voted for the orange man.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The obvious elephant in the hearing on Thursday was pointed out by Sanders himself: Every single senator on the dais takes big bucks from big pharmaceutical companies, the same companies that fund all the "independent research" thrown at Kennedy.

The age of "just shut up and trust the science," is well and truly over. As George W. Bush once put it, "fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice…well, you’re not gonna fool me again." That’s where the American people are when it comes to the medical establishment.

Kennedy stood his ground in the contentious and cacophonous hearing. He gave as good as he got, and he is absolutely right that nobody knows how many died of COVID, or how many were saved by the vaccine.

The very people in the CDC tasked with tracking such data fumbled so badly that neither RFK Jr. nor the American people can rely on their bungled assessments.

This chaos of data, as the secretary called it, is exactly why he is cleaning house at HHS, and that is exactly what President Trump and the voters want and expect from him. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS
 



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/0ohZbLT

Trump is sending a powerful message to our enemies — and allies — with the Pentagon's rebrand

When the White House announced it would rechristen the Department of Defense as the Department of War, the country didn’t just react — it combusted. Critics from across the aisle called it a costly political stunt, a distraction from real national security needs at a time when every dollar and every headline should count. Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth, herself a veteran, didn’t mince words: "This money," she argued, "would be better spent supporting military families or funding diplomacy."

Observers warn that reviving the "Department of War" label signals a more aggressive American posture, one that could undermine decades of strategic restraint and the international norms that have kept global tensions in check. Editorials from San Antonio to London’s Guardian have sounded the alarm: is this a return to saber-rattling, or just a branding exercise gone rogue?

But what if there’s more to this than meets the eye? What if, beneath the headlines and hashtags, there’s a calculated strategy at work?

TRUMP TO RENAME PENTAGON, RESTORING HISTORIC ‘DEPARTMENT OF WAR’ IN LATEST MILITARY MOVE

The Power of Words — And Why They Matter Now

Words are not mere labels; they are the lenses through which we perceive reality. At my firm, maslansky + partners, we often say: "It's not what you say, it's what they hear." And what people are hearing now is profound — but perhaps, that’s exactly the point.

From Defense to War: A Calculated Shift

Consider the implications:

 For decades, America’s military has been framed as a shield. But in a world where threats are multiplying and adversaries are emboldened, maybe the shield isn’t enough. Maybe it’s time to remind the world — and ourselves — that America still carries a sword.

Recruiting, Morale, and the Warrior Ethos

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been clear: he wants to instill a "warrior ethos." But this isn’t just about chest-thumping. It’s about recruitment. It’s about morale. It’s about telling young Americans that joining the military isn’t just about standing guard — it’s about being part of something bold, assertive and unapologetically strong.

Global Perception: A New Kind of Deterrence

For decades, America has framed its military mission as one of defense — defending democracy, allies and freedom. That framing granted us legitimacy, trust and moral authority. But it also, at times, invited our adversaries to test our limits.

Now, with the Department of War, the message is starkly different: We’re not just here to defend. We’re here to win.

This shift doesn’t just make our adversaries nervous; it could make them think twice. It could signal to the world that America is done playing defense and that the cost of aggression just went up.

Why This Matters

This isn’t about semantics; it’s about how America defines itself — and how the rest of the world defines us.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Trump and Hegseth may want Americans to hear strength, toughness and patriotism. And maybe, just maybe, that’s exactly what the world needs to hear right now. The same words that inspire at home may unsettle abroad — and that, too, could be by design.

That’s the paradox of communication. You can’t control only what you say; you have to own what people hear.

And in this case, what people hear when we go from Defense to War is profoundly different. Maybe that’s not a bug. Maybe it’s the feature.

Closing Thought

This change isn’t just a rebrand; it’s a signal — to our soldiers, our allies and our enemies. It’s a reminder that in politics, as in business, words matter.

Because at the end of the day, it’s not what you say. It’s what they hear. And sometimes, what they hear is exactly what you want them to.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/JPytlDq

Thursday, September 4, 2025

Dem Sen John Fetterman backs use of military force to combat drug trafficking into US

Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania apparently expressed support for using military force to combat drug trafficking into the United States.

"Fully support confronting the scourge of cartel drug trafficking to our nation," Fetterman noted in a post on X.

His post featured a screenshot of a Fox News Digital article headlined, "Rubio promises more strikes on Venezuelan cartels: ‘We're not going to sit back anymore'".

TRUMP'S STRIKE ON CARTEL VESSEL OFF VENEZUELA SENDS WARNING TO MADURO: NO SANCTUARY

Earlier this week, President Donald Trump noted that the American military had executed a strike against "Narcoterrorists" who had been ferrying narcotics to the U.S.

"Earlier this morning, on my Orders, U.S. Military Forces conducted a kinetic strike against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility," the president noted in a Tuesday Truth Social post

"The strike occurred while the terrorists were at sea in International waters transporting illegal narcotics, heading to the United States. The strike resulted in 11 terrorists killed in action," he declared.

US BOLSTERS MILITARY PRESENCE IN CARIBBEAN NEAR VENEZUELA AMID TRUMP'S EFFORTS TO HALT DRUG TRAFFICKING

The president's post featured footage of the strike against a boat.

"Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE!" Trump warned in the post.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has suggested that more strikes will occur in the future.

"And it'll happen again. Maybe it's happening right now, I don't know," Rubio said on Wednesday, noting that the president will "wage war" against "narcoterrorist organizations."

RUBIO PROMISES MORE STRIKES ON VENEZUELAN CARTELS: ‘WE’RE NOT GOING TO SIT BACK ANYMORE'

Fox News Digital reached out to Fetterman's office on Thursday to request additional comment from Fetterman or a spokesperson regarding the senator's apparent expression of support for the Trump administration's use of lethal military force to combat drug trafficking into the U.S. but did not receive a response by the time of publication.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/teF2wXH

Tom Brady says Arch Manning's struggles vs Ohio State could be 'blessing' in disguise

Like many others across the country, Tom Brady was tuned in to Saturday afternoon's matchup between Texas and Ohio State, ranked No. 1 and No. 3, respectively, at the time.

The contest marked the official start of the Arch Manning era, but it did not get off to an ideal start.

Entering the fourth quarter, the grandson of Archie and nephew of Peyton and Eli had just 38 passing yards. He finished with 167 in the Longhorns' 14-7 loss to the Buckeyes. It was Manning's first start on the road as a Longhorn.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM 

Social media was quick to crack some jokes about Manning, which Brady said was a "curse."

But in speaking to Pro Football Focus, Brady said that the loss and social media wrath could be a "blessing" in disguise.

"There needs to be resilience built up in the quarterback as well. So even though he didn’t have his best game today, and they lost, if he uses this to his advantage, Arch, he’s going to be tougher for it, and he’s going to have a better next game because of it," the seven-time Super Bowl champion said. "And I always felt like you’ve got to deal with a lot of adversity, from a quarterback standpoint, to toughen you up to be the true leader for the organization…

TULANE COACH SAYS NORTHWESTERN SHOWED 'DISRESPECT' TO NEW ORLEANS AFTER UNIFORM TRIBUTE DENIAL

"Arch has years beyond this to still play in college if he wants, but it's going to be up to him to see how he really wants to dig within himself and how deep he wants to dig in order to be successful. But there's nothing to show me that he won't be that. He's been that way in high school and even last year. He's got a lot of good people around him that know exactly what to do."

Manning was 17-for-30 and missed a key third-down throw on the team's penultimate play from scrimmage that would have moved the chains. He was stuffed on fourth and goal from the 1-yard line, threw a costly interception and almost threw a second.

Ohio State is now the top-ranked team in the country, while Texas dropped to No. 7.

Texas will host San Jose State, UTEP and Sam Houston State over the next three weeks. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/Kruhe6T

COVID-19 infection risk cut 'significantly' with simple nasal spray, research finds

A new study has discovered another way to potentially prevent COVID-19.

Researchers at Saarland University in Germany headed a clinical trial that found a nasal spray could reduce the risk of coronavirus infection by two-thirds.

The phase 2 study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, ran from March 2023 to July 2024 at Saarland University Hospital.

NEW COVID VARIANT MAY CAUSE 'RAZOR BLADE THROAT' — HERE'S WHAT TO KNOW

The 450 healthy adult participants were randomly assigned to receive either the azelastine nasal spray or a placebo, three times per day for 56 days.

The researchers conducted SARS-COV-2 rapid antigen testing twice a week to diagnose infection. People who had symptoms but received negative antigen test results underwent multiple PCR tests for respiratory viruses.

Among the 227 individuals who received the azelastine nasal spray, rates of confirmed COVID infection were "significantly lower" at 2.2%, compared with 6.7% for the placebo group.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

The researchers also noted an increase in the period before infection for the people taking azelastine. In these patients, the medication was linked to a lower rate of PCR-confirmed symptomatic infections and fewer confirmed rhinovirus infections (the primary cause of the common cold).

"In this single-center trial, azelastine nasal spray was associated with reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infections," the researchers wrote.

Azelastine has been available as an over-the-counter treatment for hay fever, according to a press release from Saarland University, and has previously been suggested to have an anti-viral effect against COVID and other respiratory viruses.

Lead trial researcher Professor Robert Bals, director of the Department of Internal Medicine at Saarland University Medical Center, commented in a statement that the trial has demonstrated azelastine’s impact in a "real-world setting."

"Azelastine nasal spray could provide an additional, easily accessible prophylactic to complement existing protective measures, especially for vulnerable groups, during periods of high infection rates or before traveling," he went on.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

"Our results highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to continue exploring the use of azelastine nasal sprays as an on-demand preventive treatment, and to examine its potential effectiveness against other respiratory pathogens."

Fox News Digital reached out to the researchers for comment.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/trOC7HY

Why you should back the Indiana Fever to cover the spread against the New York Liberty Tuesday

As long as there is no football, Caitlin Clark is must-see TV. Clark and the Indiana Fever (20-12) host the New York Liberty (20-13) Tuesd...